View Single Post
Old 03-10-2022   #270
florida80
R11 Độc Cô Cầu Bại
 
florida80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 113,793
Thanks: 7,446
Thanked 47,141 Times in 13,135 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 511 Post(s)
Rep Power: 161
florida80 Reputation Uy Tín Level 11florida80 Reputation Uy Tín Level 11florida80 Reputation Uy Tín Level 11florida80 Reputation Uy Tín Level 11
florida80 Reputation Uy Tín Level 11florida80 Reputation Uy Tín Level 11florida80 Reputation Uy Tín Level 11florida80 Reputation Uy Tín Level 11florida80 Reputation Uy Tín Level 11florida80 Reputation Uy Tín Level 11florida80 Reputation Uy Tín Level 11florida80 Reputation Uy Tín Level 11florida80 Reputation Uy Tín Level 11florida80 Reputation Uy Tín Level 11florida80 Reputation Uy Tín Level 11florida80 Reputation Uy Tín Level 11florida80 Reputation Uy Tín Level 11florida80 Reputation Uy Tín Level 11florida80 Reputation Uy Tín Level 11florida80 Reputation Uy Tín Level 11florida80 Reputation Uy Tín Level 11
Default

A Most Unreceptive Receptionist, Part 4
Australia, Current Events, Employees, Hobart, Non-Dialogue, Pharmacy, Stupid, Tasmania | Working | October 1, 2020
With the ongoing health crisis, doctors in my state are doing consultations by phone and having their receptionists fax or email the prescriptions to the patient’s preferred pharmacy.

One particular doctor’s surgery seemed to be having trouble with their fax machine. I received about ten copies of the cover page but none of the prescriptions that were meant to be faxed with it.

I called the practise and suggested they tried email, instead. Soon after, I received an email with an attached photograph of a pile of prescriptions.

Yes, instead of scanning or photographing them individually, the receptionist put the prescriptions in a nice, neat stack so that only the top one was readable.

At least they tried, I suppose? A day later we’re still trying to get those same prescriptions. Maybe tomorrow we’ll get lucky?
florida80_is_offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.04294 seconds with 9 queries